A top fixed-income chief just poured ice-cold water on the idea that Kevin Hassett could single-handedly turn the Federal Reserve into Donald Trump’s personal rate-cut vending machine—even if he lands the chairman’s gavel.
Wall Street’s collective blood pressure ticked up another notch Thursday as the prospect of a Trump-loyal Fed chair revived old nightmares about political meddling.
While Treasury yields barely budged in Asia—10-year notes lounging at 4.08 % like nothing happened—the options market tells a different, sweatier story: traders are piling into bets on faster cuts, just in case the Fed suddenly discovers a “because the President tweeted” clause in its mandate.
The bigger bruise, however, is to the Fed’s once-sacred reputation for independence. Investors are quietly baking a fresh “please don’t politicize us” risk premium into bonds worldwide, because nothing says “safe haven” like wondering whether next month’s dot plot was written in Mar-a-Lago Sharpie.
Gregory Peters, co-chief investment officer at PGIM Fixed Income and card-carrying member of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, delivered the reality check on Bloomberg TV with the gentle bedside manner of a doctor telling a toddler that Santa uses Excel.
“Does Kevin Hassett have the credibility within the committee to drive consensus?” Peters asked, pausing just long enough for the audience to supply the answer themselves. “We don’t know. I’m going to go with no.”
His skepticism stems from a simple, stubborn fact: the Fed is run by a committee of twelve voting members who meet in a room that smells faintly of burnt coffee and entrenched opinions. One chairman, no matter how loyal to low rates or to a particular Florida resident, cannot simply snap his fingers and make seven PhD economists suddenly agree that 2 % inflation is for losers.
Bond veterans apparently whispered the same concern directly to Treasury officials, according to the Financial Times, prompting the kind of hushed, carpeted conversations usually reserved for “the printer is jammed again.”
Trump, meanwhile, teased this week that the Fed chair race is “down to one,” while calling Hassett a “potential Fed chair” with the same tone one uses for “potential lottery winner.” Hassett pointed to a perfectly normal Treasury auction as proof the market isn’t panicking. Translation: “See? The bonds didn’t explode; therefore I am harmless.”
Some traders disagree and have responded by placing the financial equivalent of buying flood insurance during a drizzle—loading up on positions that profit if rate cuts arrive early and often.
Peters summed up the market mood with refreshing bluntness: “What happens next is the new Fed chair, the new composition, and quite candidly the meddling of the administration in Fed affairs.” He delivered the line the way a weary parent says “and then the dog ate the homework.”
For now, the yield curve remains remarkably calm, like a duck that appears serene on the surface while paddling furiously underneath. The 10-year held at 4.08 %, the 2-year nudged up a solitary basis point to 3.90 %, and everyone pretended not to notice the growing stack of “what-if” trades in the corner.
Leave a Reply